Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
Users online: 1214  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page

Table of Contents 
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 225
Pattern of peer review in dermatology domain: An analysis of reviewers' profile from

1 Department of Physiology, Fakir Mohan Medical College and Hospital, Balasore, Odisha, India
2 Department of Physiology, Kalna SD Hospital, Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal, India

Date of Web Publication16-Apr-2021

Correspondence Address:
Himel Mondal
Department of Physiology, Fakir Mohan Medical College and Hospital, Balasore, Odisha
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_326_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mondal H, Mondal S. Pattern of peer review in dermatology domain: An analysis of reviewers' profile from Indian J Dermatol 2021;66:225

How to cite this URL:
Mondal H, Mondal S. Pattern of peer review in dermatology domain: An analysis of reviewers' profile from Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 27];66:225. Available from:


Peer review is the cornerstone of a scientific journal. When an author sends manuscript to a journal, the editors first evaluate the manuscript. If it seems interesting, the editor sends it to the peer reviewers. These reviewers invest their time to understand the paper, provide suggestions regarding each section of the manuscript, and finally, convey the decision to the editor. This prepublication peer review helps to improve the quality of the manuscript and reputation of the journal.

After publication of the manuscript, it is exposed to the readers worldwide in an age of open access publication. These readers are also peers and can review the article. This is known as postpublication peer review.[1] Postpublication peer review can point out some lacuna that was not detected by prepublication peer review. In addition, an updated and better methodology for the study can be discussed. Hence, this would help the authors and readers for their future studies.[2]

Many of the open access journals provide a platform for postpublication peer review by allowing “comments” on online articles (available for this journal too). However, the use of that section is rare. PubMed Commons, a platform to add comments on published literature, was introduced in 2013. Unfortunately, it could get approximately 6000 comments against 28,000,000 published articles. With this experience of low input, PubMed Commons has been discontinued.[3]

With this background, we aimed to analyze the pattern of prepublication and postpublication peer review of expert Indian reviewers in dermatology domain. Due to blinding, it is very difficult to trace the reviewers and collect data from them., a website maintained by Clarivate Analytics, provides platform for peer reviewers to get credit for both pre- and postpublication peer reviews.[4] It has a database of more than 2 million reviewers worldwide. We searched the profile of Indian peer reviewers in dermatology domain and recorded the following data from each profile: number of journals reviewed for, number of prepublication peer review, and number of postpublication peer review. The study protocol is shown in [Figure 1]. A total of 24 profiles were included in the study; data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, and the result is shown in [Table 1]. Surprisingly, among 24 profiles, no one did a postpublication peer review.
Figure 1: Procedure of data collection from

Click here to view
Table 1: Descriptive statistics for pattern of peer review (n=24), the digits indicate numbers

Click here to view

In Indian medical education system, little is taught about peer reviewing. However, to become a competent expert in a research field, capabilities of critically reviewing an article are an essential skill.[5] It increases the analytic capabilities and helps to write flawless manuscript in future. Prepublication peer review request comes to limited expert reviewers known or discoverable to the journal editors. This limits the participation of young researchers in prepublication peer review. In contrast, anyone can do a postpublication peer review. Hence, this would help new researchers a lot. The basics of the peer-reviewing skills can always be learned from expert seniors. However, an online course has been developed by, which can be accessed by anyone from the website and it is free! It teaches the basic skills for peer review. Despite opting for the training, postpublication peer review should be promoted to build a pool of future peer reviewer.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

Both the authors are user of Publons. The first author received training and graduated from Publons Academy.

   References Top

Hunter J. Post-publication peer review: Opening up scientific conversation. Front Comput Neurosci 2012;6:63.  Back to cited text no. 1
Knoepfler P. Reviewing post-publication peer review. Trends Genet 2015;31:221-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
PubMed Commons to be Discontinued. NCBI Insights. Available from: [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 24].  Back to cited text no. 3
USA: Clarivate Analytics. Available from: [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 24].  Back to cited text no. 4
Ramsden VR, Pimlott N, Woollard R, Kvern B, Handford C, Dunikowski L, et al. Becoming a peer reviewer: Engaging in sharing and gaining knowledge. Can Fam Physician 2014;60:1158-60.  Back to cited text no. 5


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1]


Print this article  Email this article
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (474 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded29    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal