IJD
Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
 
Users online: 1891  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
Table of Contents 
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 62  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 433-434
Confusing concepts in study design


Department of Dermatology, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Web Publication10-Jul-2017

Correspondence Address:
Anupam Das
Department of Dermatology, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_251_17

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Das A, Ghosh A. Confusing concepts in study design. Indian J Dermatol 2017;62:433-4

How to cite this URL:
Das A, Ghosh A. Confusing concepts in study design. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Nov 29];62:433-4. Available from: https://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2017/62/4/433/210071


Sir,

We have read the correspondence by Kaushal, wherein the author has mentioned that cross-sectional study is a type of descriptive design. Adding to the confusion, the author has stated that cross-sectional studies and analytical studies belong to two different watertight compartments.[1]

In this context, we would like to point out some fallacies in the position taken by Kaushal.[1] Actually, observational studies are of two kinds, based on whether there is a control group. If there is none, these are descriptive studies. If there is one, it is an analytical study. Based upon whether the participants are included on the basis of exposure, outcome, or both at the same time, the analytical studies are divided into three types – cohort (participants included on the basis of exposure), case–control (participants included based on the outcome of interest), or cross-sectional (where the exposure and outcome are assessed during the same time point in two groups, the test group and the control group).

In a cross-sectional study, the investigator is supposed to measure the outcome and the exposure in the participants at a single point of time. There is no question of follow-up of the participants. In case–control studies, participants are selected on the basis of the outcome status, and in cohort studies, participants are selected based on the exposure status. However, the participants in a cross-sectional study are just selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria set for the study. Once the participants have been selected for the study, the investigator follows the study to assess the exposure and the outcomes.[2]

It is unfortunate that the correspondent has jumbled up the methodologies of research in epidemiological studies.[1] However, she has correctly pointed out that a cross-sectional study can never be a prospective one, wrongly stated in the study by Hazarika and Archana.[3]

The purpose of penning down this correspondence is to highlight the basic concepts of study design, the knowledge of which is mandatory for a prospective author of any journal dealing with clinical research.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Kaushal K. Descriptive versus analytical studies in a clinical setup. Indian J Dermatol 2017;62:321.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
2.
Setia MS. Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:261-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Hazarika N, Archana M. The psychosocial impact of acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:515-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (254 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1335    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded68    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal