Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
 
Users online: 5179  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 521-524
Cutaneous leishmaniasis in a nonendemic area of South Rajasthan: A prospective study


Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication9-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
Lalit Kumar Gupta
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur - 313 001, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.190117

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 


Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) usually occurs in areas with hot and dry climate. In India, the desert areas of Rajasthan, Gujarat, and the plains of Northwestern frontier are endemic for this disorder. Aims and Objectives: The present study was aimed to describe clinicoepidemiological profile of the cases of CL from South Rajasthan, which is a nonendemic area of Rajasthan. Materials and Methods: During a period of 4 years (2010–2014), a total of 23 patients with CL were diagnosed. All the suspected cases of CL were interrogated in detail regarding visit to areas where CL is known to occur. This was followed by clinical examination, relevant investigations, and treatment. All except one patient were treated with azole antifungals. In one patient, CO2laser ablation was done. Results: There were 12 (52.17%) males and 11 (47.83%) females with age ranging from 3 to 72 years. Duration of disease ranged from 7 days to 10 months. Face (15; 65.22%) and extremities (12; 52.17%) were involved in majority of the patients. Common morphologies were noduloulcerative lesions and crusted plaques. Tissue smear for Leishmania donovani bodies was positive in all except one patient. Conclusion: The present report highlights occurrence of CL in nonendemic area. Further epidemiological studies are required for identification of vector and strain of Leishmania involved.


Keywords: Azole antifungals, cutaneous leishmaniasis, new focus, nonendemic area


How to cite this article:
Balai M, Gupta LK, Khare AK, Srivastava A, Mittal A, Singh A. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in a nonendemic area of South Rajasthan: A prospective study. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:521-4

How to cite this URL:
Balai M, Gupta LK, Khare AK, Srivastava A, Mittal A, Singh A. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in a nonendemic area of South Rajasthan: A prospective study. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 May 9];61:521-4. Available from: https://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2016/61/5/521/190117

What was known?

  • Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is common in certain endemic areas such as Western Thar Desert of Rajasthan
  • Antimonial agents are treatment of choice for CL.





   Introduction Top


Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a vector-borne protozoal infection of the skin caused by several species of Leishmania .[1] It is mainly transmitted by sandfly, Phlebotomus , of which more than 600 species have been identified. Phlebotomus papatasi is the most common vector for CL in India.[2] All over the world, there are about 1.5 million new cases of CL each year, of these over 90% are reported from seven countries, namely, Afghanistan, Algeria, Brazil, Iran, Peru, Saudi Arabia, and Syria.[3]

In India, indigenous cases of CL, anthroponotic, and zoonotic are mainly confined to hot and dry Northwestern region and are endemic in the Western Thar Desert of Rajasthan.[4] To the best of our knowledge, CL has not previously been reported from Udaipur. Herein, we report the clinical and epidemiological features of cases of CL from South Rajasthan with the aim of documenting the new focus.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was conducted in skin department at a teaching hospital of South Rajasthan. Spanning over a period of 4-year (2010–2014), a total of 23 patients with CL were enrolled. After obtaining demographic information, all the suspected cases of CL were interrogated in detail regarding visit to areas where CL is known to occur. Diagnosis of CL was made on the basis of clinical presentation, demonstration of amastigotes in Giemsa-stained smear of the lesions, or skin biopsy. In one patient, the diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy because amastigotes were not seen in tissue smear. All the patients were treated with azole antifungals except for one patient who underwent CO2 laser ablation. Liver enzymes were assessed at baseline, after 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.


   Results Top


Twenty-three patients, 12 males (52.17%) and 11 females (47.83%), were diagnosed as a case of CL. The details are summarized in [Table 1]. The age of the patients ranged from 3 to 72 years. The majority (21; 91.3%) of patients belonged to Udaipur district and adjacent villages. Two patients belonged to other districts. Eleven patients showed clustering and belonged to two adjoining areas as depicted in the map [Figure 1]. Duration of disease at the time of presentation ranged from 7 days to 10 months. Only two patients gave a definite history of visit to a known endemic region. One patient revealed history of similar lesions in a family member. The most common involved site was face (15; 65.22%) and extremities (12; 52.17%). The lesions were either noduloulcerative lesions or crusted plaques [Figure 2]a and [Figure 3]a. Number of lesions ranged from 1 to 5. Twelve (52.17%) patients presented with single lesion while remaining 11 patients had 2–5 lesions. The size of lesions varied from 1 to 4 cm. A definite history of insect bite was revealed by two patients. Mucosal involvement over lip extended from cutaneous lesion was found in three patients. All the patients were subjected to smear examination, which was positive in 22 patients [Figure 4]. In one patient, the diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy because amastigotes were not seen in tissue smear. All except one patient were treated with azole antifungals. In one patient, CO2 laser ablation was done. The treatment was continued for 15 days to 1 month after clearance of lesions. Most patients showed regression of lesions over a period of 5–7 months [Figure 2]b and [Figure 3]b. Scarring was seen in all but four patients. Three patients were lost to follow-up. On telephonic inquiry, they reported improvement in lesions without recurrence. None of the remaining patients reported relapse of the disease activity during a follow-up of 6 months.
Table 1: Clinicoepidemiological profile of patients

Click here to view
Figure 1: Map of Udaipur (Rajasthan) showing clustering of cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis patients in two adjoining areas

Click here to view
Figure 2: Crusted plaque over left ring finger (a) and 7 months posttreatment (b)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Noduloulcerative lesions over face, pretreatment (a) and 5 months posttreatment (b)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Slit skin smear showing multiple Leishmania donovani bodies within (red arrow) and outside (black arrow) macrophages (Giemsa, ×100)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


In India, surveys carried out during 1973 in whole of erstwhile endemic areas revealed the presence of sporadic cases in Fazilka (Punjab), Rajasthan canal zone at Hanumangarh (Sriganganagar district), Jodhpur city, and rural and urban areas of Bikaner district in Rajasthan.[5] Cases have also been reported from Assam,[6] Kerala,[7] Haryana,[8] and Himachal Pradesh.[9],[10] CL has not been known to occur in South Rajasthan, and to the best of our knowledge, no reports are available so far from Udaipur district and adjoining areas. The patients evaluated in the current study were confined to Udaipur district and adjoining areas. Only two patients gave a definite history of visit to a known endemic region for the past 1 year. Epidemics of CL have been associated with deforestation, road construction, or any other activity, in which humans intrude in the habitat of the vector. Adaptation of the vector as well as the parasite to strange, often bizarre habitats and hosts is also well known.[2]

Various morphological forms of CL have been described,[11] of which noduloulcerative lesion and crusted plaque are most common. Similar observation was made in our cases also. Atypical clinical presentations of CL are increasingly seen nowadays. It is recommended that CL should be included in the differential diagnosis of common dermatological diseases such as erysipelas, chronic eczema, herpes zoster, and paronychia and uncommon disorders such as lupus vulgaris, squamous cell carcinoma, sporotrichosis, mycetoma, and other deep mycoses.[12] Demonstration of parasite in direct smears remains the easiest and the most specific method of diagnosis. A range of 30–96.23% smear positivity has been reported in the literature.[13] This depends on the age of lesions – younger lesions being more likely to yield the parasite.[14] In our study, a majority (69.6%) of the lesions were of 15 days to 3 months duration and tissue smear positivity was 95.6% which is in accordance with the study by Khatri et al .[15] However, in one patient with lesion of 15 days duration, tissue smear was negative and required confirmation of diagnosis by biopsy.

The various therapeutic modalities for the treatment of CL include physical agents, drugs such as antimonials,[9] azole antifungals,[16],[17],[18] amphotericin B,[19] and miltefosine,[20] and surgical procedures, but still there is no single uniformly effective treatment. Many of these drugs are not readily available and are also costly. Most of our patients were treated by azole antifungals either ketoconazole or itraconazole, and both of these were found to be efficacious without any side effects.

This study is of great epidemiological interest on account of focus of CL in nonendemic region of Rajasthan. Interestingly, there are no published data on exact incidence/prevalence of CL from Rajasthan. However, an article by Alvar et al .[21] on worldwide and global estimate of incidence of leishmaniasis in 98 countries has quoted a figure of 156 CL cases per year as shown in [Table 1] from the Department of skin, STD, and leprosy, Bikaner, during a 5-year period (2005–2009).

Limitations of the study

The study population was small and the identification of the species of Leishmania and Phlebotomus involved could not be done.


   Conclusion Top


The present report highlights a new focus of CL in a previously nonendemic area of South Rajasthan. Since no parasite isolation and characterization was carried out, further epidemiological studies are required for identification of vector and strain of Leishmania involved. Our 23 patients cannot be considered as true representation of magnitude of CL in our region because only suspected cases were recorded and we could have missed many nonsuspected Leishmania patients. Newer diagnostic modalities such as polymerase chain reaction may help in confirming the diagnosis of CL in other cases.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Rastogi V, Nirwan PS. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: An emerging infection in a non-endemic area and a brief update. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:272-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Kerdel-Vegas F, Harman R, Kerdel F, Dutta AK. Protozoan infections II. In: Canizares O, Harman RC, editors. Clinical Tropical Dermatology. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science; 1992. p. 293-312.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
WHO. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: An overview: Symposium. J Postgrad Med 2003;49:50.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
WHO. Control of the Leishmaniasis. WHO Technical Report Series 793. Geneva: WHO; 1990. p. 66-94.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sehgal S, Mittal V, Bhatia R. Manual on laboratory techniques in leishmaniasis. 2nd ed. Delhi: NICD; 1989. p. 2-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Baishya BR, Hazarika NK. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Assam. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1996;62:40.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
7.
Muhammed K, Narayani K, Aravindan KP. Indigenous cutaneous leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1990;56:228-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
  Medknow Journal  
8.
Verma KC, Bhargava NC, Joshi RK. Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1979;45:341-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
  Medknow Journal  
9.
Sharma RC, Mahajan VK, Sharma NL, Sharma A. A new focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Himachal Pradesh (India). Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:170-2.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.
Sharma NL, Mahajan VK, Kanga A, Sood A, Katoch VM, Mauricio I, et al. Localized cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania donovani and Leishmania tropica : Preliminary findings of the study of 161 new cases from a new endemic focus in Himachal Pradesh, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005;72:819-24.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Momeni AZ, Aminjavaheri M. Clinical picture of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Isfahan, Iran. Int J Dermatol 1994;33:260-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Bari AU, Rahman SB. Many faces of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:23-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
13.
Mashhood AA, Ahmad S, Malik MM. Is slit-skin smear an alternate to histopathology in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis? J Pak Assoc Dermatologists 2014;24:34-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kubba R, Al-Gindan Y. Some recent observations in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1989;55:7-17.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Khatri ML, Di Muccio T, Gramiccia M. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in North-Western Yemen: A clinicoepidemiologic study and Leishmania species identification by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:e15-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Alsaleh QA, Dvorak R, Nanda A. Ketoconazole in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Kuwait. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:495-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
al-Fouzan AS, al Saleh QA, Najem NM, Rostom AI. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Kuwait. Clinical experience with itraconazole. Int J Dermatol 1991;30:519-21.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Dogra J, Saxena VN. Itraconazole and leishmaniasis: A randomised double-blind trial in cutaneous disease. Int J Parasitol 1996;26:1413-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Goyonlo VM, Vosoughi E, Kiafar B, Nahidi Y, Momenzadeh A, Taheri AR. Efficacy of intralesional amphotericin B for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol 2014;59:631.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
20.
Madke B, Kharkar V, Chikhalkar S, Mahajan S, Khopkar U. Successful treatment of multifocal cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine. Indian J Dermatol 2011;56:587-90.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
21.
Alvar J, Vélez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS One 2012;7:e35671.  Back to cited text no. 21
    

What is new?

  • We report a newer focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) that needs to be further investigated
  • Oral azole antifungals are still a promising agent in the treatment of CL.


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,256 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2507    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded91    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal