 |
E-IJD CASE REPORT |
|
Year : 2016 | Volume
: 61
| Issue : 2 | Page : 236 |
|
Solitary angiokeratoma presenting as cutaneous horn over the prepuce: A rare appearance |
|
Manoj Kumar Agarwala1, Sramana Mukhopadhyay2, M Raja Sekhar1, Aswathy Menon2, CV Dincy Peter1
1 Department of Dermatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India 2 Department of Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Date of Web Publication | 1-Mar-2016 |
Correspondence Address: Manoj Kumar Agarwala Department of Dermatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamilnadu India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.177779
|
|
Abstract | | |
We present a case of a 47-year-old man with 4 months history of conical growth on the prepuce with a progressive increase in size. The patient had been treated for seminoma a decade ago. Histopathology of the growth showed features of angiokeratoma. It is unusual for angiokeratoma to masquerade as a cutaneous horn.
Keywords: Angiokeratoma, cutaneous horn, genitalia, India, prepuce
How to cite this article: Agarwala MK, Mukhopadhyay S, Sekhar M R, Menon A, Dincy Peter C V. Solitary angiokeratoma presenting as cutaneous horn over the prepuce: A rare appearance. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:236 |
How to cite this URL: Agarwala MK, Mukhopadhyay S, Sekhar M R, Menon A, Dincy Peter C V. Solitary angiokeratoma presenting as cutaneous horn over the prepuce: A rare appearance. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2023 Sep 25];61:236. Available from: https://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2016/61/2/236/177779 |
What was known?
Cutaneous horn could develop on a variety of skin conditions which can be benign, premalignant or malignant. The various causes published until date has been enlisted in [Table 1].
Introduction | |  |
Though cutaneous horns have been described in the literature for many years, they still remain novel to many clinicians especially when located in unusual areas like the genitalia. They usually appear in uncovered areas and/or from constant irritation over the scalp or face.[1] Other causes include phimosis, postsurgical trauma, and radiotherapy. It resembles the horn of an animal but has no bony structure inside. Despite the typical appearance of cutaneous horn, there can be a wide range of pathology at the base ranging from benign, premalignant to malignant changes. It is a great cause for apprehension to many patients.
Case Report | |  |
A 47-year-old man presented with a raised painless growth over the prepuce for the last 4 months. It was noted as a small growth which had been progressively increasing in size. Twelve years ago, he was diagnosed with testicular seminoma of the right side. The tumor was excised, and six cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy were given.
Physical examination revealed a solitary, firm, nontender and well-circumscribed horn-like projection over the prepuce at 2 o' clock position [Figure 1]. The scrotal skin was normal. There was no regional lymphadenopathy. Systemic examination was essentially normal. A clinical diagnosis of the penile cutaneous horn was considered, and a punch biopsy was performed.
Histopathological examination showed a raised lesion in the epidermis with hyperkeratosis, mounds of parakeratosis, focal hypergranulosis and marked irregular acanthosis with elongated [Figure 2] and inwardly curving rete pegs that enclosed several cavernously dilated thin-walled blood vessels within the papillary dermis [Figure 3]. A few of these blood vessels toward the base of the lesion showed fibrin thrombi. The deep dermis was devoid of any vascular ectasia and was otherwise unremarkable. There was no dysplasia, viral cytopathic effects or any evidence of malignancy. The lesion appeared to be completely excised. | Figure 2: Photomicrograph showing hyperkeratosis, papillomatosis, acanthosis and blood filled cavernous vessels in the papillary dermis (H and E, ×4)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: Photomicrograph showing hyperkeratosis, papillomatosis and marked acanthosis with inwardly bending broad rete pegs enclosing cavernous blood vessels with fibrin thrombi (H and E, ×4)
Click here to view |
A diagnosis of solitary angiokeratoma presenting as the cutaneous horn was established based on the clinical presentation and histopathological findings.
Discussion | |  |
Cutaneous horn (cornu cutaneum) is a clinical entity that appears as a conical protuberance over the skin surface and resembles a minuscule animal horn. They are of different shapes and sizes and can have satellite horns.[2] By definition, it is a circumscribed conical markedly hyperkeratotic lesion in which the height of the keratotic mass amounts to at least half of its largest diameter.[3] On the other hand, angiokeratoma has a pleomorphic appearance varying from papules, nodules, plaques which may be single or multiple. Of the many clinical variants, solitary angiokeratoma represents an acquired disorder presenting as single warty papule. Solitary angiokeratoma presenting as the cutaneous horn is a rarity, scarcely described in the literature.[4],[5]
Cutaneous horn could develop on a variety of skin conditions which can be benign, premalignant or malignant [Table 1]. A study analyzing 643 cases histopathologically had reported the most common causes for cutaneous horns to be benign (61.1%), followed by premalignant (23.2%) and malignant (15.7%) in that order.[6] Montgomery [7] had proposed a classification for cutaneous horn way back in 1941. It was based on clinical appearance, apparent causation and histology [Table 2]. | Table 1: Various etiologies of cutaneous horn reported in literature till date[11],[12],[13]
Click here to view |
As of today, there is no precise clinical information to make a distinction of benign or malignant etiology for a cutaneous horn.[8] In general, clinical pointers toward malignancy are large base or height to base ratio, tenderness, and advanced age. They are usually larger and harder at their base due to inflammation and are present at unusual sites such as genitalia.[6],[8] The presence of a malignancy elsewhere in the body supports the probability of cutaneous horn to be malignant.[9],[10] It is important to know the primary pathology which has led to the cutaneous horn to rule out malignancy and to direct prospective further therapy.[13]
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Bondeson J. Everard Home, John Hunter, and cutaneous horns: A historical review. Am J Dermatopathol 2001;23:362-9. |
2. | Sathyanarayana SA, Deutsch GB, Edelman M, Cohen-Kashi KJ. Cutaneous horn: A malignant lesion? A brief review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:285-7. |
3. | Bart RS, Andrade R, Kopf AW. Cutaneous horns. A clinical and histopathologic study. Acta Derm Venereol 1968;48:507-15.  [ PUBMED] |
4. | Ghosh SK, Bandyopadhyay D, Ghoshal L. Solitary angiokeratoma presenting as a cutaneous horn. Int J Dermatol 2012;51:313-5. |
5. | Kim TY, Lee KR, Kim SH, Kim DH, Yoon MS. A Case of cutaneous horn arising from angiokeratoma in infancy. Korean J Dermatol 2007;45:959-61. |
6. | Yu RC, Pryce DW, Macfarlane AW, Stewart TW. A histopathological study of 643 cutaneous horns. Br J Dermatol 1991;124:449-52. |
7. | Montgomery DW. Cornu cutaneum. Arch Dermatol Syphilol 1941;44:231-5. |
8. | Mantese SA, Diogo PM, Rocha A, Berbert AL, Ferreira AK, Ferreira TC. Cutaneous horn: A retrospective histopathological study of 222 cases. An Bras Dermatol 2010;85:157-63. |
9. | Bozza GO, Vera Navarro L, Calb EI. Cutaneous horn: Histopathology, clinical recognition and surgical treatment. A report of 2 cases. Rev Argent Dermatol 2006;87:44-50. |
10. | Festa Neto C, Falda S, Rivitti EA. Corno cutâneo: Estudo retrospectivo de 514 casos. Bras Dermatol 1995;70:21-5. |
11. | Solanki L, Dhingra M, Raghubanshi G, Thami G. An innocent giant. Indian J Dermatol 2014;59:633.  [ PUBMED] |
12. | Haddad CJ, Haddad-Lacle JE. Cutaneous horn: Get to the bottom of it. BMJ Case Rep 2014;2014. pii: Bcr 2014204447. |
13. | Gupta V, Chopra V, Verma S. A large cutaneous horn of the glans penis: A rare presentation. Indian J Surg 2014;76:143-4. |
What is new?
The present case report highlights the presence of a solitary angiokeratoma as cutaneous horn over the prepuce, which has not been reported before. Constant irritation over the prepucal skin could account for this.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2] |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 4379 | | Printed | 105 | | Emailed | 0 | | PDF Downloaded | 56 | | Comments | [Add] | |
|

|