Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
Users online: 2224  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page

Table of Contents 
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 211
Hutchinson-Gilford progeria versus mandibuloacral dysplasia

Department of Oro-Dental Genetics, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt

Date of Web Publication21-Feb-2014

Correspondence Address:
Mennat Allah I Mehrez
Department of Oro-Dental Genetics, National Research Centre, Cairo
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.127698

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mehrez MI, Mostafa MI. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria versus mandibuloacral dysplasia. Indian J Dermatol 2014;59:211

How to cite this URL:
Mehrez MI, Mostafa MI. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria versus mandibuloacral dysplasia. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 Dec 1];59:211. Available from:


In reference to the manuscript entitled, "Progeria in siblings: A rare case report" reported by Sowmiya R, et al., in the Indian J Dermatol 2011:56:581-2. [ 1] Clinically, Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria (HGP), the classical type, can be diagnosed on the spot, but at other instances certain exclusions should be done in order to clear out overlaps normally present between HGP and other laminopathies.

It was notable that the authors neglected mandibuloacral dysplasia (MAD) in their differential diagnosis, a syndrome that shares not only the underlying genetic causation but much of the manifestations mentioned in the clinical description of the probands in question. Features like short stature, bird-like facies, hair, and nail changes, crowding of teeth due to micrognathia, and normal intelligence are common between both syndromes. [2]

The fact that the siblings are the result of a consanguineous marriage suggesting an autosomal recessive inheritance, and as seen in the figures that they retained little abdominal fat at the age of 14 and 13 in addition to the persistence of their scalp hair and the absence of prominent scalp veins points towards MAD rather than HGP.

We recommend further investigations because it is our conviction that the studied cases could be an autosomal recessive MAD misdiagnosed as HGP. Chest roentograms must be done to exclude dysplasia of the clavicles. Older photographs should be supplied because in MAD the face changes to this pinched bird-like facies with age. [3] An exact diagnosis, of course, is attained through genetic analysis for LMNA and ZMPSTE24, if available, particularly targeted mutation analysis for classic HGP and sequence analysis of the coding and intronic regions for atypical HGP and MAD. [2]

   References Top

1.Sowmiya R, Prabhavathy D, Jayakumar S. Progeria in siblings: A rare case report. Indian J Dermatol 2011;56:581-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Gordon LB, Brown WT, Collin FS. Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome, 2003. In: Pagon RA, Bird TD, Dolan CR, editors. Genereviews, Seattle (WA): University of Washington; 1993. Available from: genereviews™[Last accessed on 2013 Jan 15].  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Hennekam R, Allanson J, Krantz I. Gorlin's Syndromes of the Head and Neck. 5 th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010, pp. 403-5, 447-50.  Back to cited text no. 3


Print this article  Email this article
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (346 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded44    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal