 |
IJD® QUIZ |
|
Year : 2013 | Volume
: 58
| Issue : 6 | Page : 490-491 |
|
Asymptomatic peri-orifical papular lesions in a child |
|
Bhavana R Doshi1, Shekhar S Haldar1, Uday S Khopkar2
1 Department of Dermatology, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 2 Department of Dermatology and Consultant Dermatopathologist, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Date of Web Publication | 17-Oct-2013 |
Correspondence Address:
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.119969
|
|
How to cite this article: Doshi BR, Haldar SS, Khopkar US. Asymptomatic peri-orifical papular lesions in a child. Indian J Dermatol 2013;58:490-1 |
Case Presentation | |  |
A six-year-old boy presented with a one month history of asymptomatic raised lesions around the mouth, eyes and chin. There was no history of contact allergens. The remainder of his medical history was unremarkable. Cutaneous examination revealed multiple tiny flesh-colored as well as erythematous papules, some of which were shiny and distributed around the mouth, nose, eyes and chin [Figure 1] with a tendency to become confluent at a few places. Results of the examination of the rest of the skin and mucous membranes were completely normal. Chest roentgenogram was normal. Findings of the skin biopsy specimen taken from a flesh colored papule above the chin is shown in [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. The complete blood cell count and blood chemistry panel were within normal limits. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 25 mm at the end of one hour. Mantoux test for tuberculosis was negative. | Figure 1: Multiple skin colored to erythematous papules over peri-occular, perinasal, peri-oral region and chin
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: H and E stained skin biopsy section on (×5) magnification showing circumscribed perifollicular non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas with few surrounding lymphocytes
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: H and E stained skin biopsy section on (×20) magnification showing perifollicular epithelioid cell granulomas along with scant lymphocytic infiltrate
Click here to view |
Question | |  |
What is your diagnosis? | |  |
View Answer
AnswerDiagnosis: Childhood granulomatous periorifical dermatitis (CGPD). DiscussionChildhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis (CGPD) was first described in 1970 by Gianotti et al. [1] as an asymptomatic perioral eruption in children having a waxing and waning course. Later, it was reported by Marten et al., [2] and Frieden et al. [3] who named it as "granulomatous perioral dermatitis in children". The term "facial Afro-Carribean childhood eruption (FACE)" was coined by Williams et al. [4] in 1990, to reflect its occurrence commonly in Afro-Carribean children. Finally, in 1996 Knautz et al. [5] used the term CGPD to highlight the frequent perinasal or periocular involvement and to avoid use of the term FACE which limits the diagnosis to Afro-Carribean subjects. The etiology of periorificial granulomatosis is unknown, but long-term use of topical steroids is known to be related to the disease. [6] Majority of the cases of this disease have been reported to occur in dark-skinned Afro-Carribean children. Only one Asian case has been reported so far. [7] The lesions begin as an asymptomatic, discrete 1- to 3-mm dome-shaped red or yellow-brown papules around the mouth, nose and eyes of an otherwise healthy child. Childhood granulomatous perioral dermatitis with involvement of the neck and upper trunk has also been reported. [8] Previous case reports relating CGPD to cutaneous sarcoidosis and granulomatous rosacea have been described; however, its etiology still remains controversial. [6] Histopathologically, perifollicular or interfollicular dermal granulomatous infiltrates are observed consisting of epithelioid cells, multinucleated giant cells and surrounding lymphocytes in absence of caseation necrosis. The disease is benign and self-limited. However, resolution seems to be hastened with the use of rosacea medications, such as oral macrolides or tetracyclines, topical erythromycin or metronidazole [8] and avoidance of fluorinated steroids. A few case reports mention resolution of lesions with use of topical pimecrolimus. Differential diagnosis includes perioral dermatitis (PD), rosacea, sarcoidosis, and lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei. PD is different from CGPD by its occurrence in young women in the form papules and pustules associated with scaling of the surrounding skin and sparing of the vermilion border. Rosacea usually affects the central third of the face and is characterized by flushing, telangiectasia and erythematous papulopustules and does not occur in children. Sarcoidosis on the other hand is rare in children and when it occurs in children, systemic symptoms, such as fatigue, fever, cough and dyspnea, usually accompany. Multi-organ involvement which involves the lungs, lymph nodes and eyes has been seen to occur. LMDF affects the face with a predeliction for peri-occular region and heals leaving behind a scar. Histopathologically, epithelioid cell granuloma with caseation necrosis is classically described; however, absence of caseating granuloma, granulomas with central neutrophillic abscess formation and perifollicular infiltrates of lymphocytes and scant neutrophils have also been described. [9] However, CGPD is an asymptomatic monomorphic papular eruption around the mouth and eyes in children which involves the vermilion border. Therefore, once we have ruled out other conditions while making its diagnosis, we can be assured of its spontaneous healing without scar formation. [10]The names of the winners(first three correct entries) are: - Bhushan S Madke, Mumbai
- Humanshu Gupta, New Delhi
- Geeti Khullar, Delhi
"Others who have sent correct answers are mentioned below:"
Anupam Das, Vinay K, Naveen Kumar Kansal, Shraddha Uprety, Dhiraj Kumar, Suresh Kumar K, Shouvik Ghosh, Mrinal Gupta, Vishal Chugh, Rashmi Sriram, Tirthankar Gayen, Akhilesh Shukla, Shahid Hassan, Vanya Narayan, Soumyajit Roychoudhury, Naveen Keswani, Bharati Sahu, Laxmisha Chandrashekar, S. Murugan, Pooja Aggarwal, Rishu Sarangal, Sarita Sanke, Akhilesh.A, Rameshwar Gutte, Dipti Das, Deblina Bhunia, Gayatri M.Karad, Hari Kishan Kumar.Y, Rinu Ruth George, Shvetha Jain, Mugdha Jhamwar, Shilpa Y K, Brahmita Monga, Aditi Jha, Anisha Sethi, Saurabh Singh, Balaji Govindan, Meghana Phiske, Anjali Pal, Vinitha Varghese
References | |  |
1. | Gianotti F, Ermacora E, Bennelli MG, Caputo R. Particuliere dermatitie periorale infantile. Observations sur 5 cas. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr 1970;77:341.  |
2. | Marten RH, Presbury DG, Adamson JE, Cardell BS. An unusual papular and acneiform facial eruption in the negro child. Br J Dermatol 1974;91:435-8.  [PUBMED] |
3. | Frieden IJ, Prose NS, Fletcher V, Turner ML. Granulomatous perioral dermatitis in children. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:369-73.  [PUBMED] |
4. | Williams HC, Ashworth J, Pembroke AC, Breathnach SM. FACE-facial Afro-Carribean childhood eruption. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:163-6.  [PUBMED] |
5. | Knautz MA, Lesher JL Jr. Childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 1996;13:131-4.  [PUBMED] |
6. | Fisher AA. Sarcoid-like periocular dermatitis due to strong topical corticosteroids: Prompt response to treatment with tetracycline. Cutis 1987;40:95-6.  [PUBMED] |
7. | Antony FC, Buckley DA, Russel-Jones R. Childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis in an Asian girl: A variant of sarcoid? Clin Exp Dermatol 2002;27:275-6.  |
8. | Hansen KK, McTigue MK, Esterly NB. Multiple facial, neck, upper trunk papules in a black child. Childhood granulomatous perioral dermatitis with involvement of the neck and upper trunk. Arch Dermatol 1992;128:1396-7.  [PUBMED] |
9. | Misago N, Nakafusa J, Narisawa Y. Childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis: Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei in children? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005;19:470-3.  [PUBMED] |
10. | Choi YL, Lee KJ, Cho HJ, Kim WS, Lee HJ, Yang JM, et al. Case of childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis in a Korean boy treated by oral erythromycin. J Dermatol 2006;33:806-8.  |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3] |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 4684 | | Printed | 72 | | Emailed | 0 | | PDF Downloaded | 123 | | Comments | [Add] | |
|

|