Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
 
Users online: 3893  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
Table of Contents 
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 244-245
Authors' reply


1 Department of DVL, PESIMSR, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Skin and STD, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication16-May-2012

Correspondence Address:
Raghunatha R Reddy
Department of DVL, PESIMSR, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 22707789

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Reddy RR, Shashi Kumar B M, Harish M R. Authors' reply. Indian J Dermatol 2012;57:244-5

How to cite this URL:
Reddy RR, Shashi Kumar B M, Harish M R. Authors' reply. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Dec 4];57:244-5. Available from: https://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2012/57/3/244/96222


Sir,

This is with reference to your letter commenting on the case report titled 'Cutaneous sarcoidosis - A great masquerader: A report of three interesting cases,' for case 1 and case 3. We appreciate the suggestion of considering Acne agminata or lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei (LMDF), both clinically and histpathologically, but the reasons to omit this are as follows:

  1. It differs clinically, because the lesions are smooth dome-shaped papules without any necrotic center and there were no scars, either superficial or deep, suggestive of the healed lesions of LMDF, as the lesions of LMDF last for months and heal with scarring. [1]
  2. Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei is considered as one of the invisible dermatoses, for which the diagnosis is mainly histopathological. We were waiting for the histopathology report to consider the same on arrival of the histopathology diagnosis, but for the fact that the granulomas were clearly and distinctively naked epitheloid granulomas and there was no necrosis or caseation; also the pathologist had performed the Reticulin stain as per our suggestion at the time of request and that was in favor of sarcoidosis. As you have rightly pointed out, sarcoidal granulomas could be the first stage of histological presentation of LMDF. [2] We would like to inform you that the lesion biopsied was nearly one year old, by which time probably if it were to be LMDF, it would have developed necrosis at least histologically.
  3. Also, the elevated serum Angiotensin converting enzyme level was a contributory finding for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.
By this we conclude by stating that at all levels, clinical, investigative, histopathological, and special stain, the diagnosis was very close to sarcoidisis, and we could not find good supportive points for the diagnosis of LMDF.

We deeply appreciate your communication.

 
   References Top

1.Kumano K, Tani M, Murata T. Dapsone in the treatment of military lupus of the face. Br J Dermatol 1983;109:57-62.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Ioffreda MD. Inflammatory diseases of hair follicle, sweat glands, and cartilage. In: Elder DE, editor-in-chief. Lever's histopathology of the skin. 10 th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. p. 459-501.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (348 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1853    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded43    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal