Year : 2009 | Volume
: 54 | Issue : 4 | Page : 391--392
Sanitary pad dermatitis
Wiwanitkit House, Bangkhae, Bangkok, Thailand
Wiwanitkit House, Bangkhae, Bangkok
|How to cite this article:|
Wiwanitkit V. Sanitary pad dermatitis.Indian J Dermatol 2009;54:391-392
|How to cite this URL:|
Wiwanitkit V. Sanitary pad dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Feb 28 ];54:391-392
Available from: http://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2009/54/4/391/57626
Generally, female menstruation is considered as a normal physiological fertile cycle. Menstruation can be described as the passing of blood via vagina. The passing blood can soak the dress; and sanitary pad has been developed to absorb the passing blood. Modern disposable sanitary pads are becoming available worldwide.  Pad usage practices depend on culture, economics, and menstrual physiology.  In this article, the author reports an interesting case of sanitary pad dermatitis.
A 38-years-old female patient presented with itching and burning sensation over her perineal area at the contact site with a sanitary pad. The skin lesion presented as red edematous skin with some clear fluid-filled vesicles. No other abnormality was detected through physical examination. The patient noted that she had these symptoms every month on and off and she had even tested herself by using sanitary pads during the non menstruation period and experienced the same symptoms despite using the sanitary pads by various manufactures. This case was diagnosed to be sanitary pad dermatitis.
This case presents an interesting situation. There are three aspects of the above situation: Gynecological, dermatological, and family medicine. As far as the gynecological aspect is concerned, skin lesions at perineum has several implications ranging from benign to malignant diseases. In some cases, biopsy for laboratory investigation is needed.
However, in this case, the skin lesion is strongly related to the use of sanitary pads. It presented on and off during the menstrual cycle of the patient, concordant with the nature of sanitary pad dermatitis. , A pattern of skin lesion on the contact surface rules out menstruation related skin lesion. ,
As far as the dermatological aspect, is concerned, the pattern is a clear contact dermatitis. There is no need for any provocative test in this case because the patient performed self provocation. Concerning the inductive agent, the material used for the manufacture of sanitary pads is expected to be the main allergen, as there was no change observed when sanitary pad of another manufacturer was used. Indeed, methyldibromo glutaronitrile in sanitary pads is the main inductive agent.  Considering the family medicine aspect, the social context in this case is well demonstrated. The Thai and people in many developing countries usually think that talking about menstruation is taboo  and this can lead to under-diagnosis of many pathological disorders. In this case, the patient did not allow photography due to this rooted belief. Health education on this topic is recommended. Till now, there is no report on the exact incidence of sanitary pad dermatitis in Thai literature.
|1||Farage M, Elsner P, Maibach H. Influence of usage practices, ethnicity and climate on the skin compatibility of sanitary pads. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007 ;275:415-27.|
|2||Williams JD, Frowen KE, Nixon RL. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromo glutaronitrile in a sanitary pad and review of Australian clinic data. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:164-7. |
|3||Rademaker M. Allergic contact dermatitis to a sanitary pad. Australas J Dermatol 2004;45:234-5.|
|4||Irinoye OO, Ogungbemi A, Ojo AO. Menstruation: Knowledge, attitude and practices of students in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Niger J Med 2003;12:43-51.|