Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
 
Users online: 420  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
Table of Contents 
E-CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 529
Adverse reactions to tattoos


Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, England, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication1-Sep-2014

Correspondence Address:
Ankeet S Jethwa
Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, England
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.139908

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Jethwa AS. Adverse reactions to tattoos. Indian J Dermatol 2014;59:529

How to cite this URL:
Jethwa AS. Adverse reactions to tattoos. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Jun 27];59:529. Available from: http://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2014/59/5/529/139908


Sir,

I imagine Dr Wollina's ears are burning. Indeed, I have been spreading nothing but good words about Dr Wollina's superb retrospective analysis of "severe and adverse events related to tattooing." [1] Such an area of dermatology simply does not receive the glitz it deserves. With the estimated incidence of 0.02%, this makes for a significant caseload at the population level. As tattoos become more commonplace amongst Western culture the number of complications is set to rise. Certainly I learn much about my patients from their tattoos, which are often only revealed on the operating table and, during the recent years, I have noticed a marked increase in the prevalence of tattoos.

I propose that dermatology heads must seriously consider setting up databases of adverse reactions to tattoos to aid prospective study. Knowledge of the conditions under which the tattoo was created as well as patient factors is invaluable to further our understanding of adverse reactions. Only with a sufficiently powered prospective observational study will we be able to identify any specific factors predisposing to such a fascinating casemix. With so many variables including the type of ink used, equipment used to apply it and the conditions under which it is done we can only postulate mechanisms. Large-scale observational studies will help to elude the mechanisms and, more importantly, culprits.

I believe the pigments would be the offenders in many of the reactions described. [2],[3] However, regulatory bodies may not have as much control over the situation of inks as much as we would hope. For example, in the United States, tattoo inks are considered to be cosmetics; consequently, the Food and Drugs Authority does not have the authority to exert stringent regulation. [4] Earlier this year, in the United States, there were reports of a breakout of non-tuberculosis mycobacterial skin infection stemming from a single ink company. [5] It is the responsibility of tattoo parlours to warn about potential adverse affects following tattoo art. Indeed, I suspect, although tattoo artists will be aware of the infective complications of tattoos, fewer will be aware of the more florid reactions that present to the medical profession. [6] Ultimately, close work between dermatological associations and tattoo parlours will be warranted to facilitate feedback of adverse reactions and reduce their incidence. As India and the rest of the East becomes more Westernised, we can expect an increase in reports of these adverse reactions due to the increase in variety of inks used. We must stay ahead whilst we can by being vigilant.

 
   References Top

1.Wollina U. Severe adverse events related to tattooing: An retrospective analysis of 11 years. Indian J Dermatol 2012;57:439-43  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Wenzel SM, Welzel J, Hafner C, Landthaler M, Bäumler W. Permanent make-up colorants may cause severe skin reactions. Contact Dermatitis 2010;63:223-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Garcovich S, Carbone T, Avitabile S, Nasorri F, Fucci N, Cavani A. Lichenoid red tattoo reaction: Histological and immunological perspectives. Eur J Dermatol 2012;22:93-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.LeBlanc PM, Hollinger KA, Klontz KC. Tattoo ink-related infections: Awareness, diagnosis, reporting, and prevention. N Engl J Med 2012;367:985-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tattoo-associated nontuberculous mycobacterial skin infections-multiple states, 2011-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61:635-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Ortiz AE, Alster TS. Rising concerns over cosmetic tattoos. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:424-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (207 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1056    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded68    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal