Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
 
Users online: 342  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
Table of Contents 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 176-181
Radiation port cutaneous metastases: Reports of two patients whose recurrent visceral cancers presented as skin lesions at the site of previous radiation and literature review


1 Department of Dermatology, Medical School, the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
2 Department of Dermatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA

Date of Web Publication21-Feb-2014

Correspondence Address:
Philip Randolph Cohen
10991 Twinleaf Ct., San Diego, CA 92131-3643
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.127680

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Radiation therapy is associated with a variety of complications, including the development of primary skin cancers in the radiated region. However, it is rare for patients with visceral cancers who are treated with radiation therapy to subsequently develop cutaneous metastasis within the radiation port. We describe two patients with internal malignancies who developed cutaneous metastases within their radiation ports following radiotherapy. In addition, we used PubMed to perform an extensive literature review and identify additional reports of cutaneous metastasis within a radiation port. We excluded patients who developed melanoma or primary skin cancers in the radiation port. We also excluded patients with non-solid organ malignancies. Herein, we summarize the characteristics of 23 additional patients who experienced radiation port cutaneous metastases and explore possible mechanisms for the occurrence of radiation port cutaneous metastases.


Keywords: Cutaneous, cutaneous nodules, immunocompromised district, irradiation, isoradiotopic, metastasis, radiation port


How to cite this article:
Hoyt BS, Cohen PR. Radiation port cutaneous metastases: Reports of two patients whose recurrent visceral cancers presented as skin lesions at the site of previous radiation and literature review. Indian J Dermatol 2014;59:176-81

How to cite this URL:
Hoyt BS, Cohen PR. Radiation port cutaneous metastases: Reports of two patients whose recurrent visceral cancers presented as skin lesions at the site of previous radiation and literature review. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2018 Sep 22];59:176-81. Available from: http://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2014/59/2/176/127680

What was known?
1. Radiation is frequently used in cancer treatment, and is associated with a variety of local and systemic adverse effects. 2. Cutaneous effects of radiation therapy include dermatitis, erythema multiforme, hyperpigmentation, poikiloderma, and primary non-melanoma skin cancers. 3. Visceral cancers metastasize to the skin in about 5% of patients, and cutaneous metastases often signify advanced disease with poor prognosis.



   Introduction Top


The skin may be the site of metastasis of visceral cancers. In a meta-analysis of 20,380 patients with metastatic cancer, Krathen et al. found that 5.3% (1,080 of these individuals) developed cutaneous metastasis. [1] Radiation therapy is often used in the treatment of internal malignancies. [2] Radiation typically affects the skin within the radiation port; however, it is rare for the primary cancer to metastasize within the irradiated skin. [3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] We describe two patients who developed cutaneous metastases in the area previously irradiated for treatment of their primary malignancies. Additionally, we summarize the characteristics of other patients who developed cutaneous metastases within their radiation ports.


   Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 65-year-old man with a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal presented in February 2011 with newly formed nodules on his scrotum. The patient had been diagnosed with cancer of the anal canal in September 2010 and was treated with chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and cisplatin) and concurrent radiation. His radiation therapy was delivered in 29 2 Gy fractions over 38 days for a total of 58 Gy. His treatment was completed on November 4, 2010. During his therapy, he developed severe radiodermatitis which subsequently resolved completely.

In January 2011, he discovered several new skin lesions on his scrotum [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. Cutaneous examination revealed eight painless nodules on his right scrotum, and two additional nodules on his right inguinal fold. All of the new lesions were restricted to the area within his radiation port. They were mildly pruritic; one had ruptured and extruded foul-smelling white material. Biopsies from both sites showed metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, indicating loco-regional failure of his chemoradiation therapy.
Figure 1: Recurrent metastatic anal canal squamous cell carcinoma presenting within the radiation port as multiple nodules on the right scrotum

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a and b) Closer views of the right scrotum shows the cutaneous metastases located in the area of radiotherapy

Click here to view


Restaging chest roentgenogram and computerized axial tomography scan also discovered lung metastases. The patient was sequentially treated with several different antineoplastic agents either as single or combination drug therapy. However, there was not only increased size of previous scrotal nodules but also continued appearance of new cutaneous metastases. He was referred to the Phase 1 department to be considered for a trial of an investigational drug treatment.

Case 2

A 52-year-old woman was diagnosed in February 2009 with invasive ductal carcinoma in her left breast and poorly differentiated carcinoma in her right breast. She was subsequently treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Following her initial chemotherapy, she received weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks and trastuzumab every 3 weeks for 1 year.

In October 2009, the patient underwent modified radical mastectomy of the left breast and right lumpectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. She began radiation therapy in December 2009. This included bilateral radiation of the chest wall, internal mammary nodes, supraclavicular fossa, and axillary apex totaling 50 Gy in 25 fractions. In addition, her left infraclavicular fossa received 10 Gray in 5 fractions, and her mastectomy and lumpectomy scars were boosted with an additional 14 Gray in 7 fractions. In February 2010, she was restaged and considered to be free of cancer.

Cutaneous examination in August 2011 revealed macular erythema with pruritic, erythematous macules, superficial plaques, and small papules within the radiation port on the left chest wall [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. She also had a nonpruritic, hyperpigmented superficial plaque with surrounding areas of erythema within the radiation port on the right breast [Figure 3] and [Figure 5]. The skin lesions had appeared 1 month earlier and had not improved with over-the-counter topical preparations applied by the patient. Biopsy of both areas revealed metastatic breast carcinoma.
Figure 3: Recurrent metastatic breast carcinoma presented within the radiation ports of the left chest and right breast

Click here to view
Figure 4: (a) Distant and (b and c) closer views of radiation port cutaneous metastases of breast cancer on the left chest presenting as (b) erythematous papules and plaques and (c) macular erythema

Click here to view
Figure 5: (a) Distant and (b) closer views of right breast radiation port in which recurrent cutaneous metastatic breast cancer presents as a hyperpigmented plaque with surrounding erythema

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Radiation therapy is an integral modality in the treatment regimen of oncology patients. [2] High-energy electromagnetic radiation (in the form of X-rays, gamma rays, or electron beams) is used to damage nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of rapidly dividing cells, thereby blunting further cell proliferation. [23] Radiotherapy can also be administered by implanted or injected sources of radioactivity. [23] Because cancer cells proliferate more rapidly than somatic cells, they are more susceptible to the effects of radiation therapy. [23]

The potential toxicities of radiation can be significant, however, the benefits of radiotherapy often outweigh the risks. [21] In addition, the quality of the radiation source and the treatment techniques are constantly improving, allowing better delivery to the target organ while minimizing the effects on the surrounding tissue. [24]

Cutaneous effects of radiation therapy can include not only acute dermatitis and chronic skin changes such as hyperpigmentation and poikiloderma, [24] but also several other conditions such as acne, [25] blistering disorders, [26] epilation, [23],[27] erythema multiforme, [28] fungal infections, [29] graft-versus-host disease, [30] lichen planus, [25],[26],[31] radionecrosis, [32] and scleroderma. [27] Radiotherapy has also been shown to predispose individuals to subsequent development of primary, predominantly non-melanoma, skin cancers in the radiation port. [33],[34] Much less commonly, treatment with radiation may subsequently be associated with the appearance of metastasis from the treated internal malignancy to the radiated skin.

Cutaneous metastasis within a radiation port is a rare occurrence. [3] We performed an extensive review of the literature available on PubMed using the following search criteria: Cutaneous or skin, metastasis or metastases, radiation or irradiation, and not melanoma or sarcoma or basal cell. We excluded patients who developed melanoma or other primary skin cancers within their radiation port. We also excluded those who developed benign tumors or non-solid organ tumors in the previously radiated region. To the best of our knowledge, radiation port cutaneous metastasis from visceral malignancies has only been described in 25 patients [Table 1]. The majority of the patients (88%) were women. Only three men, who had either carcinoma of the breast, anal canal, or stomach, have been described with radiation port cutaneous metastases.
Table 1: Characteristics of patients with cutaneous metastases of original tumor in radiation ports [a,b]

Click here to view


The breast was the most common site of primary neoplasm, accounting for 59% (17 individuals) of these patients. Other locations of primary tumors included the female genital organs [such as the cervix (two individuals), uterus (two individuals), and vulva (one individual)], anal canal (one individual), nasopharynx (one individual), and stomach (one individual). The patients ranged in age from 35 years to 70 years (mean = 54 years, median = 55 years) when their primary malignancy was originally diagnosed.

The average time between diagnosis of the primary tumor and the appearance of cutaneous metastases was 24 months (range: 3 to 66 months, median = 19 months). This duration of time is similar to that observed in oncology patients who develop cutaneous metastases that were not confined to (or originated within) their radiation port. [35]

The mean survival for cancer patients who developed cutaneous metastases, based upon the findings from two major reviews (which included 20,380 patients and 7,316 patients), was 1 year. [35] Similar to the observations from these studies, the prognosis for patients who develop cutaneous metastasis within their radiation port is also poor. Their median survival, after discovery of their cutaneous metastasis, was 6 months and patient survival ranged from 1 month to 1 year.

It is widely accepted that localized insults to the skin can make that region more susceptible to disease and infection. In 1995, Wolf et al. described a phenomenon in patients with previous herpes zoster infection who subsequently developed tumors at the site of their original viral infection. He coined the term "isotopic response" to describe "the occurrence of a new skin disorder at the site of another, unrelated, and already healed skin disease", however, his definition excluded exogenous damage, such as that occurring from radiation, as the etiology of initial skin injury. [36] Subsequently, Shurman et al. expanded on Wolf et al.'s concept by recommending the use of the term "isoradiotopic response" to refer to dermatoses arising within a radiation port. [26]

Ruocco et al. have postulated a mechanism of pathogenesis for the isotopic and isoradiotopic response. They suggested that cutaneous disease or injury (including ionizing radiation) can impair lymph drainage and alter neuromediator signaling. These changes result in an "immunocompromised district" that is particularly susceptible to infections, tumors, or immune disorders. [37] In addition, dysregulation of cytokines has been implicated in the development of a radiation-induced immunocompromised district. [38] Finally, others postulate that radiation-induced damage to endothelial cells leads to trapping of tumor cells and enhances the occurrence of metastasis. [3] Studies done in animals have demonstrated increased metastasis in tissue that was previously irradiated. [3]


   Conclusion Top


Cutaneous metastasis within a radiation port is rare. Recurrent tumor metastases, localized to previously irradiated skin, have been observed in 25 patients. This phenomenon occurred most frequently in women in whom radiotherapy was a component of the management of their primary breast cancer. Less frequently, radiation port cutaneous metastases have been noted in patients with neoplasms originating in the female genital organs, the anus, the nasopharynx, and the stomach. The appearance of radiation port cutaneous metastases was noted as early as 1-3 months, and as long as 6 years, following completion of radiotherapy; however, the mean duration of time between the diagnosis of the patient's primary cancer and the discovery of their radiation port cutaneous metastases was 24 months. We speculate that an "immunocompromised district" created by the radiation therapy may facilitate the spread of malignant cells to the previously radiated skin, which we refer to as radiation port cutaneous metastases.

 
   References Top

1.Krathen RA, Orengo IF, Rosen T. Cutaneous metastasis: A meta-analysis of data. South Med J 2003;96:164-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Fitzgerald TJ, Jodoin MB, Tillman G, Aronowitz J, Pieters R, Balducci S, et al. Radiation therapy toxicity to the skin. Dermatol Clin 2008;26:161-72.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Diehl LF, Hurwitz MA, Johnson SA, Butler WM, Taylor HG. Skin metastases confined to a field of previous irradiation. Report of two cases and review of the literature. Cancer 1984;53:1864-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Cole H, Halnan KE. Facilitation of tumour spread in irradiated tissue after prophylactic post-operative x-ray therapy for breast cancer. Clin Radiol 1971;22:133-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Turner WH, Greenall MJ. Sarcoma induced by radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery. Br J Surg 1991;78:1317-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Pakula AS, Robinson JK. Recognizing malignant skin changes following breast cancer. Am Fam Physician 1992;45:1287-92.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Dao T, Moore GE. Clinical observations of conditions which apparently enhance malignant cell survival. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1961;112:191-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Ito H, Kubo A, Shigematsu N, Hashimoto S. Skin metastases within the previous radiation field after prophylactic postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis 1984;2:235-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Zucali R, Merson M, Placucci M, Di Palma S, Veronesi U. Soft tissue sarcoma of the breast after conservative surgery and irradiation for early mammary cancer. Radiother Oncol 1994;30:271-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Schwarz G. [About post-operative radiotherapy after surgery for breast cancer] Uber die nachbestrahlung bie operiertem mammaskarzinom. Strahlentherapie 1935;53:647-81.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Maruyama K, Yokoyama K. Unusual case of metastasis to the irradiated skin in radiotherapy after surgical treatment of breast cancer. Rinsho Hoshasen 1965;10:916-21.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Karakuzu A, Koc M, Ozdemir S. Multiple cutaneous metastases from male breast carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55:1101-2.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Agrawal A, Yau A, Magliocco A, Chu P. Cutaneous metastatic disease in cervical cancer: A case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010;32:467.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Marley NF, Marley WM. Skin metastases in an area of radiation dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1982;118:129-31.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Elit L, Lukka H, Friedman E. Cutaneous metastasis of papillary serous uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:208-11.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Meltzer J, Ahmed SA, Archambeau JO. The development of metastases within a field of previous irradiation: A case report. Cancer 1981;48:717-20.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Schurch O. [About skin metastasis in the irradiation field from gastric cancer.] Uber hautmetastase im bestrahlungsfeld bie phyloruscarcinom. Z Krebsforsch 1935;41:47-50.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Ghaemmaghami F, Modares M, Behtash N, Moosavi AZ. Multiple, disseminated cutaneous metastases of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004;14:384-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Hood IC, Qizilbash AH, Salama SS, Young JE, Archibald SD. Sebaceous carcinoma of the face following irradiation. Am J Dermatopathol 1986;8:505-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Marschall FH. [About cancerous skin metastases in the X-ray radiation field at lips and glandular cancer.] Uber karzinomatose Hautmetastasen im Rontgensbestrahlungsfeld bei Lippen-und Drusenkrebs. Dermat Wchnschr 1935;100:137.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Trefzer U, Voit C, Milling A, Audring H, Sterry W. Malignant melanoma arising in a radiotherapy field: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Dermatology 2003;206:265-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Bevilacqua G, Mariotti S, Castagna M, Marcocci C, Di Coscio GC, Martino E. Cutaneous metastasis of a radiation-associated thyroid medullary carcinoma. J Endocrinol Invest 1984;7:653-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.Late complications of radiotherapy. Drug Ther Bull 1997;35:13-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Testa ER, Cooper JS. Adverse cutaneous effects of ionizing and non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1980;6:210-3.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.Carrotte-Lefebvre I, Delaporte E, Mirabel X, Piette F. Radiation-induced skin reactions (except malignant tumors). Bull Cancer 2003;90:319-25.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Shurman D, Reich HL, James WD. Lichen planus confined to a radiation field: The "isoradiotopic" response. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:482-3.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.Davis DA, Cohen PR, McNeese MD, Duvic M. Localized scleroderma in breast cancer patients treated with supervoltage external beam radiation: Radiation port scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:923-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Chodkiewicz HM, Cohen PR. Radiation port erythema multiforme: Erythema multiforme localized to the radiation port in a patient with small-cell lung cancer. Skinmed: Dermatology for the Clinician, In press.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Cohen PR, Maor MH. Tinea corporis confined to irradiated skin. Radiation port dermatophytosis. Cancer 1992;70:1634-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Martires KJ, Baird K, Citrin DE, Hakim FT, Pavletic SZ, Cowen EW. Localization of sclerotic-type chronic graft-vs-host disease to sites of skin injury: Potential insight into the mechanism of isomorphic and isotopic responses. Arch Dermatol 2011;147:1081-6.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Kim JH, Krivda SJ. Lichen planus confined to a radiation therapy site. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:604-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Rosen T, Dupuy J, Maor M, Altman A. Radiation port dermatophytosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19:1053-6.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Cohen PR, Prieto VG. Radiation port xanthogranuloma: Solitary xanthogranuloma occurring within the irradiated skin of a breast cancer patient-report and review of cutaneous neoplasms developing at the site of radiotherapy. J Cutan Pathol 2010;37:891-4.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Chopra KF, Cohen PR. Linear basal cell carcinomas: Report of multiple sequential tumors localized to a radiotherapy port and review of the literature. Tex Med 1997;93:57-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Nashan D, Meiss F, Braun-Falco M, Reichenberger S. Cutaneous metastases from internal malignancies. Dermatol Ther 2010;23:567-80.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Wolf R, Brenner S, Ruocco V, Filioli FG. Isotopic response. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:341-8.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Ruocco V, Brunetti G, Puca RV, Ruocco E. The immunocompromised district: A unifying concept for lymphoedematous, herpes-infected and otherwise damaged sites. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009;23:1364-73.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Smith KJ, Yeager J, Skelton HG. Localized scleroderma in breast cancer patients treated with supervoltage external beam radiation: Radiation port scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;37:806-8.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]    

What is new?
1. Radiation port cutaneous metastasis is a rare complication associated with treatment of internal malignancies with radiation therapy. This may represent an "isoradiotopic response." 2. The breast is the most common site of primary malignancy that subsequently metastasizes to the previously radiated skin. 3. Prognosis for patients who develop radiation port cutaneous metastasis is poor (median survival of 6 months).


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (2,077 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Reports
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4318    
    Printed28    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded67    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal