Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
 
Users online: 351  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page
DERMATOSURGERY ROUND
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 327

Teenage patients with ingrown toenails: Treatment with partial matrix excision or segmental phenolization


1 Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Bozok University Medical Faculty, Yozgat, Turkey
2 Department of Dermatology, Bozok University Medical Faculty, Yozgat, Turkey
3 Department of Family Medicine, Bozok University Medical Faculty, Yozgat, Turkey
4 Department of General Surgery, Kocatepe University Medical Faculty, Afyon, Turkey
5 Department of Dermatology, Sütçü Imam University Medical Faculty, Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Murat Korkmaz
Bozok Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Yozgat
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.113970

Rights and Permissions

Background: Ingrown toenails (IT) is a very common problem leading to significant associated morbidity. The articles related to phenolization for matrix removal in teenagers with IT are not enough in the foot surgery literature. Aims: To compare the postoperative recovery periods, complication rate, and tolerability of partial matrix excision and segmental phenolization in teenagers with IT. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients (13-17 years) with 48 IT were randomly divided into two groups and were treated with partial matrix excision (Group I) and segmental phenolization (Group II). We assessed the recurrence rates, postoperative complications, duration of analgesic usage, and time to return to daily activities. Results: There was no significant difference between the demographic and clinical data of the two groups. Three patients in Group I and two patients in Group II experienced moderate pain postoperatively. These patients used analgesics for 3 days. The rates of postoperative complications and recurrences between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference ( P = 0.688). The time to return to normal daily activities was significantly shorter in Group II patients than in Group I patients ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: Partial matrix excision is a very safe model of therapy in the surgical treatment of teenagers with IT. It has low recurrence rate and minimal postoperative morbidity. We concluded that segmental phenolization is also as safe as partial matrix excision in the treatment of IT and patients return to their daily activities in less time with this treatment modality.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2273    
    Printed53    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded62    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal