Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
 
Users online: 40  
Home  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
Table of Contents 
CORRESPONDENCE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 413
VDRL test and its interpretation


Department of Microbiology, GGSMC, Faridkot, India

Date of Web Publication3-Sep-2012

Correspondence Address:
Renu Bansal
Department of Microbiology, GGSMC, Faridkot
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.100511

PMID: 23112373

Get Permissions



How to cite this article:
Jindal N, Bansal R. VDRL test and its interpretation. Indian J Dermatol 2012;57:413

How to cite this URL:
Jindal N, Bansal R. VDRL test and its interpretation. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2014 Aug 22];57:413. Available from: http://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2012/57/5/413/100511


Sir,

We read with great interest the CME article titled "VDRL ttest and its interpretation," which was published in March 2012 (2012; 57(1): 3-8) issue of Indian Journal of Dermatology. [1] The article very clearly and rightly conveyed the facts and misconceptions about this test and its interpretations in pregnant women and in cases of congenital syphilis, neurosyphilis and HIV infection. Interpretation of the VDRL test in congenital syphilis was specially excellent as it suggested that all infants born to mothers who have reactive non-treponemal and treponemal tests results should be evaluated with a quantitative RPR/VDRL test performed on infant's serum and not on cord blood. Infection in the infant is indicated when the infant's antibody titer is higher than that of the mother and it is shown to rise. Testing of IgM treponemal antibody is not sufficiently reliable to diagnose congenital syphilis. [2] However as microbiologists we would also like to clarify the following points:-

  1. The three basic methods (dark ground microscopy, non-treponemal and treponemal serological tests) are in use for diagnosis of syphilis and not in screening for syphilis. However, the testing strategy for syphilis varies depending on whether the aim is to detect all stages of syphilis or only infectious syphilis. In the United States (US), some European countries and India, only non-treponemal tests are used for screening. [3]
  2. The non-treponemal tests - VDRL/RPR - are both flocculation tests but are not modification of original Wasserman reaction. Wasserman reaction is a complement fixation reaction and not a flocculation test.
  3. The result of the VDRL/RPR is read as reactive or non-reactive and not as positive/negative. Although this has been made clear by the authors themselves but at number of places in the interpretation part of the article, the test results have been mentioned as positive or negative. If the test is reactive, it is quantified and the lowest dilution (last dilution i.e., titer) at which the test result is reactive is given as final result. Quantitative tests establish a baseline of reactivity from which change can be measured. Recent infection can be demonstrative as a four-fold rise in titer and re-infection and relapse as persistently reactive (serofast) test result. [3]
  4. In "conclusions" in the article, it has been mentioned that  Treponema pallidum Scientific Name Search  not easily cultured and cannot be grow on artificial media. In fact, T. pallidum has never been cultured continuously on artificial media or in fertile eggs or tissue cultures. Of the various animals, rabbits can be infected in the skin, testes and eye, although no progressive disease is produced. [4]


 
   References Top

1.Nayak S, Acharjya B. VDRL test and its interpretation . Indian J Dermatol 2012;57:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University press; 2005. p. 218.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Larsens A, Narris SJ, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. Syphilis & related treponematosis. In: Topley and Wilson. Microbiology and Microbial infections. 9 th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 649.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Brook SG, Carroll KC, Budtel JS, Morse SA, Mietznes TA. Spirochaetes and other spiral microorganism. In: Jawetz, Melnick & Adelberg's Medical Microbiology. 25 th ed. New York: McGraw Hills; 2010. p. 301.  Back to cited text no. 4
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (307 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed789    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded129    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Site supported by Galderma