SYMPOSIUM IN DERMATOLOGY
|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 707-710
|Plant dermatitis: Asian perspective
Anthony Teik Jin Goon, Chee Leok Goh
National Skin Centre, Singapore
|Date of Web Publication||14-Jan-2012|
Chee Leok Goh
National Skin Centre, 1 Mandalay Road, Singapore - 308 205
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Occupational and recreational plant exposure on the skin is fairly common. Plant products and extracts are commonly used and found extensively in the environment. Adverse reactions to plants and their products are also fairly common. However, making the diagnosis of contact dermatitis from plants and plant extracts is not always simple and straightforward. Phytodermatitis refers to inflammation of the skin caused by a plant. The clinical patterns may be allergic phytodermatitis, photophytodermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, pharmacological injury, and mechanical injury. In this article, we will focus mainly on allergy contact dermatitis from plants or allergic phytodermatitis occurring in Asia.
Keywords: Phytodermatitis, phytophotodermatitis, plant dermatitis
|How to cite this article:|
Goon AJ, Goh CL. Plant dermatitis: Asian perspective. Indian J Dermatol 2011;56:707-10
| Introduction|| |
Once an individual is sensitized to a plant allergen, subsequent contact will elicit acute cutaneous lesions within 12-48 hours. The reaction is an acute eczema with severe pruritus, oedema, erythematous papules and urticarial-looking plaques that rapidly become studded with vesicles and tense bullae. Skin lesions appear where the plant has brushed against the skin, typically on the legs, thighs, hands and upper limbs. They classically display a linear morphology of crisscrossing streaks. The sticky sap can be transferred from the fingers to more distant sites, such as the face, trunk, and genitals. New lesions tend to continue to erupt for 1-2 weeks and may last for 4-8 weeks, or to flare up after stopping short courses of systemic corticosteroids. In subsequent episodes, the skin eruptions tend to become more severe, and they tend to appear after a shorter interval following exposure to the plant.
| Plants that Cause Allergic Phytodermatitis in Asia|| |
Several families in the plant kingdom are notorious causes of allergic phytodermatitis. Of particular importance are the Anacardiaceae (i.e., the cashew or sumac family) and Compositae (also known as the Asteraceae, including the aster, daisy or sunflower family). Different types of allergic phytodermatitis exist in different regions of the world.
The Anacardiaceae family
Plants such as the poison ivy, poison oak and poison sumac is a common cause of allergic phytodermatitis in North America. When damaged, all parts of the plant exude a sticky, strongly allergenic oleoresin, called urushiol. The allergens are pentadecylcatechols or heptadecylcatechols which possess benzene rings that bear hydroxyl groups at position 1 and 2, and aliphatic side chains at position 3. The length of the side chain and the number of its double bonds determine the allergenicity of the molecule.
In Asia, the Anacardeaceae family includes the mangoes fruit tree (Mangifera indica), lacquer tree (Toxicodendron vernicifluum) and hardwood (Gluta renghas) are the commonest causes of allergic phytodermatitis. The mango fruits contain urushiol in their exocarp (outer skin). Facial and perioral dermatitis occurs when a sensitized individual bites into an unpeeled mango. Approximately 80% of Japanese cabinetmakers exposed to the varnish extracted from the lacquer tree develop hand and forearm dermatitis. The cashew nut tree, Anacardium occidentale, bears reddish fruits that contain the kidney-shaped nut within a three-layered pericarp. The middle layer is filled with brownish oil rich in cardol and anacardic acid, chemically similar to urushiol. These catechols are destroyed when the nut is properly roasted and processed, but harvesters can develop allergic phytodermatitis from exposure to the oil.
Although unrelated to the Anacardiaceae, the Ginkgo biloba tree, which is found in temperate Asian countries, is also a source of urushiol-like catechols. The allergenic ginkgolic acid is present exclusively in the flesh of the drupe-like ovule.
The compositae family
Causes ragweed dermatitis in North America and chrysanthemum allergy worldwide. In India, airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by Parthenium hysterophorus, from this family of plants is well known. The allergens are sesquiterpene lactones, 15-carbon molecules made of a sesquiterpene linked to a lactone ring. The allergenicity of sesquiterpene lactones is increased by the presence of an α-methylene group attached to the lactone ring.
Sesquiterpene lactones are present in fresh plants, pollen, and in particles from dried plants of the Compositae family. Classically, sesquiterpene lactone-induced dermatitis affects men more than women. Outdoor workers e.g., farmers and gardeners, have a higher risk for sensitization, but florists and nursery workers may be affected. Sensitization occurs through direct and airborne skin contact. Subacute eczematous lesions initially involve the face, neck, and the exposed areas of the upper limbs. On the face, massive lichenification may give rise to a leonine facies mimicking cutaneous lymphoma and actinic reticuloid.
Phytophotodermatitis often mimics allergic phytodermatitis. Some families of plants contain psoralens or furocoumarins that trigger a phototoxic eruption when activated by exposure to ultraviolet-A light after contact with the skin. This reaction is not immunologically mediated, and it affects anyone under appropriate circumstances. The plant chemicals loosely bind to DNA but, when photoexcited, become covalently bound to pyrimidine bases on DNA strands, leading to cell death.
Phytophotodermatitis is most often caused by contact with plants of the Apiaceae, or Umbelliferae family. They include weeds and edible plants, such as carrot, parsnip, dill, fennel, celery and anise.
Lesions will appear within 8-24 hours of exposure to the sap of a psoralen-containing plant followed by sun exposure. Accompanied by a burning sensation, erythematous, irregular patches and streaks appear on areas that were exposed to both plant and light. Vesicles and large blisters may be present, but pruritus is not a major feature of the eruption, as opposed to allergic phytodermatitis. As the lesions heal, they are replaced by deeply pigmented macules that slowly fade in a few weeks to months. The juice of lime or other citrus fruits may flow around the mouth, spill over the hands from squeezing the fruits, or drip on the body followed by sun exposure during beach and poolside activities, producing bizarre blotches, spotty and trickle-shaped streaks of pigmentation. Contact with the cut ends of psoralen-containing celery has been reported to caused an epidemic of phytophotodermatitis affecting the forearms of grocery store workers.
| Reports of Phytodermatitis in Asia|| |
Plant contact dermatitis is one of the commonest causes of contact dermatitis in India. Of these, parthenium contact dermatitis is the most common cause of plant contact dermatitis. This is may be due to direct contact or airborne contact to the plant allergen. Parthenium hysterophorus,,,,,,,,, is a weed that grows profusely the whole year round, especially during the wet season. It is found in wasteland, along roads and railway tracks, water channels and in fields. The allergen is a sesquiterpene lactone called, parthenin. Parthenin is present in all parts of the plant, especially in the trichomes under the leaves. Airborne contact dermatitis affects the chest. The hands, forearms, feet, legs, other exposed parts are usually affected and the dermatitis may become generalized when severe.
Xanthium strumarium,,,, is another weed in the Compositae family reported to cause allergic contact dermatitis in India. Patients with airborne contact dermatitis from Parthenium hysterophorus often have concomitant positive patch tests to this weed, although there have also been patients with allergy this weed alone without conconmittant allergy to parthenium.
Allergies to other plants have also been reported in India. They include the chrysanthemums ,,,,,, viz., Helianthus annuus (sunflower),  Dahlia pinnata (pinnate dahlia),  Mikenia scandens and Holigarna ferruginea.
Laundrymen in India, called dhobis, mark their customers' clothes with an urushiol-containing black oleoresin extracted from the nut of Semecarpus anacardium. The ink is unaffected by boiling and has caused numerous cases of ''dhobi itch,'' an allergic contact dermatitis at the site of contact, usually the nape of the neck. 
Florists making garlands with the white flowers of Walidda antidysenterica has been reported to develop occupational allergic contact dermatitis from the flowers.
Similar to Malaysia, rengas (Gluta rengas) hardwood has been reported to cause allergic contact dermatitis in Indonesian woodworkers. Such contact dermatitis is seen in carpenters handling the rengas woods and foresters and hickers coming into contact the the resin exuded by the plant.
The Japanese lacquer tree (Toxicodendron vernicifluum) of the Anacardiaceae family has been reported to cause occupational allergic contact dermatitis in carpenters and furniture makers and polishers. Allergic contact dermatitis to the plant resin has also been reported in consumers  who comes into contact with freshly varnished furniture where uncured resins remains. The causative allergen is urushiol.
Cases of occupational allergic contact dermatitis to tobacco leaves,  mitsuba (Cryptotaemia japonica Makino) vegetable leaves and its stalks  and okra (or lady's fingers, Hibiscus esculentus) leaves  have been reported in Japanese farm workers. Airborne contact dermatitis due to Japanese cedar pollen has recently been reported. 
Rhus dermatitis, especially from Toxicodendron vernicifluum (lacquer tree or varnish tree), is still a cause of allergic phytodermatitis in Korea. Plants of the Rhus genus are related to poison ivy, poison oak and poison sumac. They belong to the Anacardiaceae family. Rhus sensitization is high in the general Korean population. In several Korean reports of patients with suspected contact dermatitis, the incidence of urushiol-positive patch tests was 18%,  while that of commercial Japanese Rhus allergen-positive patch tests was 13.9%.  Ingestion of chicken with Rhus may also cause systemic contact dermatitis. 
Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis from contact with a lacquer tree, also from the Anacardiaceae family, has also been reported. Other cases of plant dermatitis from Korea include allergic contact dermatitis from chrysanthemum;  irritant contact dermatitis from Ranunculus (buttercup) , and Pulsatilla koreana (Korean pasque flower);  contact urticaria from Castanea crenata (Japanese chestnut),  apple, plum and peach; and photocontact dermatitis from Ficus carica (common fig)  and Angelica gigas have also been reported.
There have been reports of allergic contact dermatitis to a member of the Anacardiaceae family, Gluta renghas (rengas), a hardwood which resulted in dermatitis in woodworkers. Photocontact dermatitis from lime used in traditional medicine has been seen in several patients and may present in bizarre patterns. The cause of the photocontact dermatitis was reported to be psoralen the lime juice.
Anacardiaceae such as the cashew nut tree (Anacardium occidentale) has been reported cause allergic contact dermatitis in the Philippines.  The fumes from roasting cashews may also cause skin irritation. Another member of the Anacardiaceae, the mango fruit (Mangifera caesia), may also cause allergic contact dermatitis on the lips, face and/or neck. Contact with the fruit or sap of red pepper (Capsicum annum) has been reported to cause erythematous or bullous dermatitis.
Irritation reactions from several plants have been reported in the Philippines. These include Dieffenbachia (an ornamental house plant), Hierba mala (which has a caustic sap), Fleurya interrupta (lipang-aso, a herbal plant), Calotropis gigantea (crown flower). Some plants irritate chemically via calcium oxalate crystals, silicates, glycosides or alkaloids, while others irritate mechanically via hairs (trichomes) or spines (glochids).
Allergic phytodermatitis has been reported from mango fruits as described above. Allergic contact dermatitis from rengas (similar to those seen in Indonesia and Malaysia) have been reported among carpenters and woodworkers handling the rengas group of wood. Some cases were reported to cause erythema multiforme-like eruption.
Contact urticaria from cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) has been observed  in Sri Lanka. Plants belonging to the Anacardiaceae family such as mango (Mangifera indica) and cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale) are common causes allergic phytodermatitis in Sri Lanka. Another genus from the same family, Semecarpus, causes streaky laundry mark dermatitis, as the nut is used to mark laundry. This is similar to marking nut dermatitis in India, where it is known as dhobi-mark dermatitis.
Sri Lanka also sees its share of Compositae allergic contact dermatitis. The plants incriminated include the Tithonia diversifolia (a shrub found on roadsides and in wasteland). Their presentation is similar to that of the parthenium dermatitis in India, where airborne-contact dermatitis may be a presenting feature.
Nettles of the genus Urtica and Asian poison ivy have been reported to cause allergic contact dermatitis in Taiwan. Betel sellers were reported to develop finger dermatitis, most of which are irritant contact dermatitis although allergic contact dermatitis to the betel has been reported. Mango contact dermatitis is common during the mango season in Taiwan. 
Like the Japanese lacquer tree, the Thai lacquer tree (Melanorrhoea usitata) which belongs to the Anacardiaceae family is a common cause of allergic phytodermatitis.  The allergen in this case is thitsiol.
| References|| |
|1.||Lonkar A, Jog MK. Dermatitis caused by a plant Parthenium hysterophorus: A preliminary report. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1968;34:194-6. |
|2.||Lonkar A, Mitchell JC, Calnan CD. Allergic contact dermatitis from Parthenium hysterophorus. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 1974;60:43-53. |
|3.||Lonkar A, Nagasampagi BA, Naraynan CR, Landge AB, Sawaikar DD. Anantigen from Parthenium hysterophorus Linn. Contact Dermatitis 1976;2:151-4. |
|4.||Siddiqui MA, Singh R, Sharma RC. Contact dermatitis due to Parthenium hysterophorous. Indian J Med Res 1978;68:481-4. |
|5.||Tiwari VD, Sohi AS, Chopra TR. Allergic contact dermatitis due to Parthenium hysterophorous. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1979;45:392-400. |
|6.||Bajaj AK, Covil DC, Bhargava SN. Contact dermatitis due to plants. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1982;48:268-70. |
|7.||Singh KK, Singh C. Air-borne contact dermatitis in Varanasi. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1986;52:140-2. |
|8.||Sharma VK, Kaur S. Contact dermatitis due to plants in Chandigarh. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1987;53:26-30. |
|9.||Sharma SC, Kaur S. Contact dermatitis from compositae plants. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1990;56:27-30. |
|10.||Nandakishore TH, Pasricha JS. Pattern of cross-sensitivity between four compositae plants Parthenium hysterophorus, Xanthium strumarium, Helianthus annuus and Chrysanthemum coronarium in Indian patients. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:162-7. |
|11.||Pasricha JS. A high rate of cross-sensitivity between Parthenium hysterophorus and Xanthium strumarium in Indian patients with contact dermatitis. J Europ Acad Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1994;3:36-43. |
|12.||Pasricha JS, Bhaumik P, Agarwal A. Contact dermatitis due to Xanthium strumarium. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1990;56:319-21. |
|13.||Pasricha JS, Verma KK, D'Souza P. Air-borne contact dematitis caused exclusively by Xanthium strumarium. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol1995; 61: 354-355. |
|14.||Sharma SC, Tanwar RC, Kaur S. Contact dermatitis from Chrysanthemum in India. Contact Dermatitis 1989;21:69-71. |
|15.||Tanwar RC, Sharma SC, Kaur S. Chrysanthemum contact dermatitis: Clinical patterns and patch testing with ethanolic extracts. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1990;56:112-4. |
|16.||Pasricha JS, Nandakishore TH. Air-borne contact dermatitis due to Chrysanthemum with true cross-sensitivity to Parthenium hysterophorus and Xanthium strumarium. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1992;58:268-71. |
|17.||Sharma SC, Kaur S. Contact dermatitis from Dahlia pinnata. Contact Dermatitis 1990;23:204-5. |
|18.||Pasricha JS, Barua KN. Contact hypersensitivity to Mikenia scandens - a recently introduced wild creeper of Assam and Meghalaya. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1987;53:112-3. |
|19.||Srinivas CR, Kulkarni SB, Menon SK, Krupashankar DS, Iyengar MA, Singh KK, et al. Allergenic agent in contact dermatitis from Holigarna ferruginea. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:219-22. |
|20.||Livingood CS, Rogers AM, Fitz-Hugh T. Dhobie mark dermatitis. JAMA 1943;123:23-6. |
|21.||Perera WD. Plant dermatitis. Sri Lanka J Dermatol 1995;1:2-3. |
|22.||Kawai K, Nakagawa M, Kawai K, Konishi K, Liew ML, Yasuno H, et al. Hyposensitization to urushiol among Japanese lacquer craftsmen. Contact Dermatitis 1991;24:146-7. |
|23.||Ohyama K, Uehara T, Nohara T, Nomura S, Arao T. Contact dermatitis due to tobacco leaves. Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi 1986;96:1677-80. |
|24.||Kanzaki T. Contact dermatitis due to Cryptotaemia japonica Makino. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20:60-1. |
|25.||Matsushita T, Aoyama K, Manda F, Ueda A, Yoshida M, Okamura J. Occupational dermatoses in farmers growing okra (Hibiscus esculentus L.). Contact Dermatitis 1989;21:321-5. |
|26.||Yokozeki H, Satoh T, Katayama I, Nishioka K. Airborne contact dermatitis due to Japanese cedar pollen. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:224-8. |
|27.||Kook HI, Woo TH. Experimental study on latent sensitivity to Rhus trees. Korean J Dermatol 1971;9:9-14. |
|28.||Park KB, Eun HC, Lee YS. A study of the prevalence of contact sensitizationto Rhus and Ginkgo antigens. Korean J Dermatol 1986;24:22-7. |
|29.||Ahn BM. Rhus-chicken. Taehan Kan Hakhoe Chi 2002;8:245-7. |
|30.||Kim SW, Lee JD, Kim TY. Two cases of contact dermatitis due to Chrysanthemum moniliform. Allergy 1992;12:320-5. |
|31.||Jeon BK, KolL MO, Park SD. Three cases of primary irritant dermatitis due to Buttercup (Rannunculus sceleratus). Korean J Dermatol 1992;30:886-91. |
|32.||Kim JW, Cho YH, Hong CK. A case of irritant dermatitis due to Rannuculus. Allergy 1994;14:74-7. |
|33.||Kim JS, Cha SH, Park SD. A case of irritant dermatitis due to Pulsatilla Koreana. Korean J Dermatol 1997;35:339-43. |
|34.||Lee AY, Lee SH, Lee YS. A case of contact urticaria due to apple, plum andpeach. Korean J Dermatol 1989;27:543-6. |
|35.||Lee CB, Han EN, Kim NI, Haw CR. Phytophotodermatitis. Korean J Dermatol 1986;24:278-82. |
|36.||Hann SK, Park YK, Im S, Byun SW. Angelica induced phytophotodermatitis. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1991;8:84-5. |
|37.||Benezra C, Ducombs G, Sell Y, Foussereau J. Plant Contact Dermatitis. Toronto: B. C. Decker Incorporated, 1985. p. 68. |
|38.||Perera WD. Special problems and perspectives from Sri Lanka. The principles and practice of contact and occupational dermatology in the Asia-Pacific Region. In: Ng SK, Goh CL editors. Singapore: World Scientific; 2001. p. 204-8. |
|39.||Sun CC. Patch testing with mango preparations. 8 th Int Symp Contact Dermatitis.Cambridge, England, 1986. |
|40.||Kullavanijaya P, Ophaswongse S. A study of dermatitis in the lacquerware industry. Contact Dermatitis 1997:36;244-6. |
|This article has been cited by|
||Phytodermatitis in Eastern Turkey
| ||Hatice Uce Ozkol,Omer Calka,Necmettin Akdeniz,Suleyman Mesut Pinar |
| ||Dermatitis. 2014; 25(3): 140 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Malaysian Family Physician
| || Authors of Document Keah, S.H., Chng, K.S. |
| ||A Chinese new year rash. 2013; |
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||3227 |
| Printed||94 |
| Emailed||1 |
| PDF Downloaded||190 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||2 |