Indian Journal of Dermatology
  Publication of IADVL, WB
  Official organ of AADV
Indexed with Science Citation Index (E) , Web of Science and PubMed
 
Users online: 3749  
Home About  Editorial Board  Current Issue Archives Online Early Coming Soon Guidelines Subscriptions  e-Alerts    Login  
    Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
CURRENT PERSPECTIVE
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 140-141
Electronic medical records


Clinical Tutor, Pediatric Dermatology Division, Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, India

Correspondence Address:
Rajib Malakar
H. No. 9/1 A, Jatin Bagchi Road, Kolkata - 700029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.26940

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Malakar R. Electronic medical records. Indian J Dermatol 2006;51:140-1

How to cite this URL:
Malakar R. Electronic medical records. Indian J Dermatol [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Nov 21];51:140-1. Available from: http://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2006/51/2/140/26940


Paper-based records have been in existence for centuries and their gradual replacement by computer-based records has been slowly underway for over twenty years in western healthcare systems. Computerized information systems have not achieved the same degree of penetration in healthcare as that seen in other sectors such as finance, transport and the manufacturing and retail industries. Electronic medical record systems lie at the center of any computerized health information system. Without them other modern technologies such as decision support systems cannot be effectively integrated into routine clinical workflow.

The 2003 IOM patient safety report describes an EMR as encompassing: "a longitudinal collection of electronic health information for and about persons [immediate] electronic access to person- and population-level information by authorized users; provision of knowledge and decision-support systems [that enhance the quality, safety, and efficiency of patient care] and support for efficient processes for health care delivery." [IOM, 2003, P4 (footnote)].

The US IOM report, Key Capabilities of an Electronic Medical Record System [Tang, 2003], identified a set of 8 core care delivery functions that electronic health record systems should be capable of performing in order to promote greater safety, quality and efficiency in health care delivery. They are:

Health information and data: Having immediate access to key information - such as patients' diagnoses, allergies, lab test results, and medications - would improve caregivers' ability to make sound clinical decisions in a timely manner.

Result management: The ability for all providers participating in the care of a patient in multiple settings to quickly access new and past test results would increase patient safety and the effectiveness of care.

Order management : The ability to enter and store orders for prescriptions, tests, and other services in a computer-based system should enhance legibility, reduce duplication, and improve the speed with which orders are executed.

Decision support: Using reminders, prompts, and alerts, computerized decision-support systems would help improve compliance with best clinical practices, ensure regular screenings and other preventive practices, identify possible drug interactions, and facilitate diagnoses and treatments.

Electronic communication and connectivity: Efficient, secure, and readily accessible communication among providers and patients would improve the continuity of care, increase the timeliness of diagnoses and treatments, and reduce the frequency of adverse events.

Patient support: Tools that give patients access to their health records, provide interactive patient education, and help them carry out home-monitoring and self-testing can improve control of chronic conditions, such as diabetes.

Administrative processes: Computerized administrative tools, such as scheduling systems, would greatly improve hospitals' and clinics' efficiency and provide more timely service to patients.

Reporting: Electronic data storage that employs uniform data standards will enable health care organizations to respond more quickly to federal, state, and private reporting requirements, including those that support patient safety and disease surveillance."

The benefits of EMR can be summarized in the 6 main areas

Replace paper-based medical records which can be incomplete, fragmented (different parts in different locations), hard to read and (sometimes) hard to find.

Provide a single, shareable, up to date, accurate, rapidly retrievable source of information, potentially available anywhere at any time. Require less space and administrative resources.

Potential for automating, structuring and streamlining clinical workflow.

Provide integrated support for a wide range of discrete care activities including decision support, monitoring, electronic prescribing, electronic referrals radiology, laboratory ordering and results display.

Maintain a data and information trail that can be readily analyzed for medical audit, research and quality assurance, epidemiological monitoring, disease surveillance and support for continuing medical education.

Widespread implementation of EMRs has been hampered by many perceived barriers including

Technical matters (uncertain quality, functionality, ease of use, lack of integration with other applications.

Financial matters - particularly applicable to non-publicly funded health service systems (initial costs for hardware and software, maintenance, upgrades, replacement.)

Resources issues, training and re-training; resistance by potential users; implied changes in working practices.

Certification, security, ethical matters; privacy and confidentiality issues

Doubts on clinical usefulness

Incompatibility between systems (user interface, system architecture and functionality can vary significantly between suppliers' products).

From a dermatologists perspective, even in our resource limited Indian background, adopting EMR not only improves our quality of patient care but also opens a new horizon of interdisciplinary and peer consultation as well as the chance of self improvement. Unfortunately as mentioned earlier, the financial constraints will be the main hindrance in rapid incorporation of EMR in our country. Fortunately some of the EMR providers have uploaded free but partially limited version of their software. Even in their limited capacity they have enough functionality and are customizable to fulfill majority of a dermatologist's necessity. Another problem with the freely available software is that they are geared to meet the health structure and billing system of the country of the developer. We hope that in near future Indian entrepreneurs will show some interest in providing an Indian solution.

A list of some freely downloadable EMR's can be found in doctorsgadget forum……. http://www.doctorsgadgets.com/forum/emr-software/95-free-emr.html



This article has been cited by
1 Challenges to inter-departmental coordination of patient transfers: A workflow perspective
Abraham, J., Reddy, M.C.
International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2010; 79(2): 112-122
[Pubmed]
2 Challenges to inter-departmental coordination of patient transfers: A workflow perspective
Joanna Abraham,Madhu C. Reddy
International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2010; 79(2): 112
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (30 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  



 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4586    
    Printed139    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded139    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal